Archive

Found 27 results

Sort by: Author [ Title  (Asc)] Type Year
Filters: First Letter Of Title is C  [Clear All Filters]
A B [C] D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
C
Busby Chris, Hamdan Malak, Ariabi Entesar.  2010-06-07.  Cancer, Infant Mortality and Birth Sex-Ratio in Fallujah, Iraq 2005–2009. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 2828-2837; doi:10.3390/ijerph7072828.  Download: busby-et-al-fallujah-iraq2005-2009.pdf (81.39 KB)
Schwartz Philipp.  2006-10-06.  CBSS Working Group on Nuclear and Radiation Safety. Baltic Sea NGO Forum, Stockholm, 5-7 October 2006.  Download: bsngo2006_schwartz200610.pdf (529.83 KB)
Edwards Gordon.  2013-09-20.  CCNR's Intervention on OPG's Proposal for a Deep Underground Dump [DUD]. Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility (CCNR).  Download: dgr_ge_transcript_gordon_edwards20130920.pdf (700.31 KB)
Hegelund Per(ed.).  2006-10-06.  Chemical Weapons Dumped After 2nd World War. Baltic Sea NGO Forum, Stockholm, 5-7 October 2006.  Download: bsngo2006_ chemical-weapons-200610.pdf (193.72 KB)
Kerstin Wim, de Rijk Peer, de Roo Alexander, Storm van Leeuwen Jan Willem.  2000-10.  Coming Clean - How Clean is Nuclear Energy? Groenlinks in the European Union. The Greens / European Free Aliance.  Download: groenlinks200010.pdf (1.29 MB)
Goldstick Miles.  2008-10-22.  Comments on Lietuvos Energija AB’s Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regarding a New Nuclear Power Plant in Lithuania. The Swedish Environmental Movement’s Nuclear Waste Secretariat (Milkas).  Download: lithuania_new_nuke20081022milkas.pdf (24.13 KB)
Goldstick Miles.  2008-06-16.  Comments on the Fortum Corporation’s Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the Loviisa 3 Nuclear Reactor in Finland. The Swedish Environmental Movement’s Nuclear Waste Secretariat.  Download: loviisa3-20080616milkas.pdf (24.27 KB)
Busby Chris.  2012-03-11.  Comparing Fukushima releases with Chernobyl An Update for the 1st Anniversary. Green Audit, Aberystwyth K Occasional Paper 2012/2.  Download: fukushima-chernobyl-comparison-report-11.03.2011.pdf (163.81 KB)